Austrian ‘admits daughter abuse’ |
||||
A 73-year-old Austrian man has confessed to imprisoning his daughter in a cellar for 24 years and fathering her seven children, police have said. Police said Josef Fritzl also admitted burning the body of a baby that died at the house in Amstetten, Lower Austria. Mr Fritzl has been taken to court while authorities are caring for the woman, now 42, and her six surviving children. Photos of the man’s basement show a concealed network of tiny windowless chambers which were soundproofed. Prosecutors say Mr Fritzl is expected to be taken into protective custody after appearing before a magistrate. The woman, Elisabeth, disappeared aged 18 on 28 August 1984 when, according to her testimony to police, her father lured her into the cellar, drugging and handcuffing her before locking her up. She is reported to have been made to write a letter which made it look as if she had run away. The head of the criminal affairs bureau in Lower Austria, Franz Polzer, said Mr Fritzl had admitted sexually abusing his daughter repeatedly during the time he imprisoned her. Mr Polzer said Mr Fritzl told investigators Elisabeth had given birth to seven children, including twins in 1996, but one died shortly after being born and that he had thrown the body into an incinerator in the building. The surviving children are now aged between five and 19 years.
The cellar rooms, covering an area of approximately 60 sq m (650 sq ft), were equipped for sleeping and cooking, and with sanitary facilities. A reinforced concrete door was built into the wall that separated the “dungeon” from the house and electronically locked – the code known only to the suspect, who provided his captives with food and necessities, police said.
Three of the children were kept in the cellar with their mother and had never seen daylight, police told a news conference. The other three children were adopted or fostered by the suspect, after he forced Elisabeth to write a letter saying she could not look after the baby, according to police. His wife, Rosemarie, with whom he had seven of their own children, appears to have been unaware of the alleged crimes. The security chief for Lower Austria, Franz Prucher, said he had been down into the cellar where it was easy to understand how the abuse was not discovered. “The cellar is very deep,” he said. “There you can cry and nobody will hear, nobody. There you can cry as loud as you can, you can hear nothing.” The alleged abuse and Mr Fritzl’s apparent double life came to light when the eldest of the children in the cellar, 19-year-old Kerstin, became seriously ill earlier this month and had to be taken to hospital. Aerial shots of the investigation scene A television appeal by medical staff for the patient’s mother was seen by Elisabeth on a TV set in the cellar and she urged her father to let her go to hospital. Police arrested Mr Fritzl shortly afterwards and took all the children into care. “If you look at him today, you would hardly believe he was capable of doing these things. This man led a double life for 24 years,” said Mr Polzer. He said it was incredible that it had been kept secret for all that time. Both the father and Elisabeth say no one else had access to the cellar, according to police, who are appealing to anyone with information about Mr Fritzl to contact them. Asked why the captives had not tried to escape before, Mr Polzer said one had to consider the fact that the woman was small and weak and even the eldest boy, now 18, was “a small boy, a weak boy”. “You have to put yourself into the situation of these people,” he said. “They led a completely different life to ours, they do not know what we know. These children were born into the jail, they knew nothing else.” Illness Kerstin is said to be in a coma in hospital. The head of the intensive care unit at the Amstetten hospital, Albert Reiter, said the impact of her experiences would eventually become clearer.
“The connection between the effects of 20 years without daylight, the incest and other illnesses, we will research in the coming hours and days,” he said. The media were told the other children who had been kept in the cellar were in surprising physical health, but very pale. The region’s district governor, Hans-Heinz Lenze, said he had spoken to the five-year-old boy. “He even told me how happy he was and how fantastic it was to ride in a real car,” he said. Help offer Journalist Andreas Wetz, of the daily newspaper Die Presse, told the BBC the suspect’s neighbours in Amstetten, a small town about 130km (80 miles) west of Vienna, were in shock at the revelations. “The man who is said to have done this, they said he was funny, he talked to neighbours, he might be a little introverted, but they had no idea that this person could do this,” he said. The BBC’s Bethany Bell says the case is reminiscent of that of Natascha Kampusch, the Austrian teenager held captive in a cellar in a house in a Vienna suburb for eight years, who ran to freedom in 2006. While police are not connecting the two cases, many Austrians are asking how such matters went undiscovered, she says. Miss Kampusch, now 20, has offered to help the victims. She told Austria’s ORF radio: “I can imagine that it is very difficult both for the mother of the children as well as for the wife of the perpetrator to get through this.” ![]() |
||||
Archive for April, 2008
Austrian ‘admits daughter abuse’
Google: religion is not ‘factual’ on abortion
Religious liberty
Google: religion is not
‘factual’ on abortion
http://www.christian.org.uk/issues/2008/rellib/google_10apr08.htm
The Christian Institute’s action against Google rumbled on today as the Internet giant attacked religious pro-life groups for not being ‘factual’ on abortion.
The Institute attempted to place an ad on the popular search engine to promote its anti-abortion articles. But Google refused saying it doesn’t allow ads for sites that mix religion and abortion.
Before now it has not been known why. But today Google UK’s media office told newspapers: “We only allow ads that have factual information about abortion.”
Report continues below…
Listen to a LBC radio debate:
The slur is likely to further alienate religious groups who are already highly critical of Google’s biased policy.
News of the Institute’s legal action has made global headlines, not least in the US where Google’s HQ is based.
Fox News, one of Americas most-watched news channels, is carrying the story on its website. The Institute has given interviews to a number of overseas radio chat shows.
Today’s Daily Mail features a follow-up story showing the highly controversial ads that Google allows while banning religious pro-life ads.
Websites selling knuckle-dusters and ouija boards as well as dating sites designed for married people who want to have affairs are advertised on Google.
Mike Judge, Head of Communications at The Christian Institute, said: “For Google to feature ads like these when at the same time they ban our ad because we are ‘religious’ shows a warped set of values.
“To insinuate that religious groups are not factual on the issue of abortion is a huge insult to religious people across the globe.
“This is not a debate about the rights and wrongs of abortion. It is about free speech. You can be pro-abortion and still recognise that Google is acting unfairly.
“The real test of free speech is whether you allow those you disagree with to have their say. If you only allow your friends to promote their view, that is no free speech at all.”
View The Christian Institute’s ad as it would have looked
Google’s email to the Institute, refusing to accept the ad
The letter from the Institute’s solicitors to Google
http://www.christian.org.uk/issues/2008/rellib/google_10apr08.htm
Christian Institute challenges Google on abortion ad
Christian Institute challenges Google on abortion ad
The Christian Institute’s action against Google rumbled on today as the internet giant attacked religious pro-life groups for not being ‘factual’ on abortion.
The Institute attempted to place an ad on the popular search engine to promote its anti-abortion articles. But Google refused, saying it doesn’t allow ads for sites that mix religion and abortion.
Before now it has not been known why. But today Google UK’s media office told newspapers: “We only allow ads that have factual information about abortion.”
The slur is likely to further alienate religious groups who are already highly critical of Google’s policy, which they say is biased.
News of the Institute’s legal action has made global headlines, not least in the US where Google’s HQ is based.
Fox News, one of Americas most-watched news channels, is carrying the story on its website. The Institute has given interviews to a number of overseas radio chat shows.
Today’s Daily Mail features a follow-up story showing the highly controversial ads that Google allows while banning religious pro-life ads.
Websites selling knuckle-dusters and ouija boards as well as dating sites designed for married people who want to have affairs are advertised on Google.
Mike Judge, Head of Communications at The Christian Institute, said: “For Google to feature ads like these when at the same time they ban our ad because we are ‘religious’ shows a warped set of values.
“To insinuate that religious groups are not factual on the issue of abortion is a huge insult to religious people across the globe.
“This is not a debate about the rights and wrongs of abortion. It is about free speech. You can be pro-abortion and still recognise that Google is acting unfairly.
“The real test of free speech is whether you allow those you disagree with to have their say. If you only allow your friends to promote their view, that is no free speech at all.”
http://www.inspiremagazine.org.uk/news.aspx?action=view&id=2345
Angry Christians sue Google over internet ad
The Christian Institute is sueing Google on the grounds it is infringing the Equality Act 2006.
The group accused the popular search engine of having a “warped value system” after pointing out that it allows advertisements for “pornography and instruments of violence”.
Websites selling knuckle-dusters and ouija boards, as well as dating sites designed for married people who want to have affairs, are advertised on Google.
But the company turned down the non-denominational Christian charity that wanted to pay Google so that whenever the word “abortion” was typed in, its link would appear on the right hand side of the screen.
The link would have read: “UK abortion law news and views on abortion from the Christian Institute.”
Google said it had a policy of declining sites which mixed abortion with religious views.
It does, however, accept ads for abortion clinics, secular pro-abortion sites and secularist sites which attack religion.
Entering the word “abortion” into the search area immediately brings the user to adverts for Marie Stopes abortion clinics.
A search of other topics indicates that Google is happy to display ads to its millions of users for many other services.
Typing the words “having an affair” reveals a list of ads aimed at those looking to engage in extramarital relationships.
There are sites advertising advice on outdoor and group sex when words such as “swinging” and “dogging” are typed in.
Google also appears to have few qualms about sites advertising the sale of knuckle-dusters and ouija boards, as well as thousands of ads for pornographic material.
A spokesman for the US company said yesterday: “Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain abortion and religion-related content. We only allow ads that have factual information about abortion.
“We recognise that this is a very emotive subject and that people have strong views on both sides. Google takes no view on this issue one way or the other as a company.”
The spokesman added ads for most weapons were not allowed and those for pornography were strictly monitored. Anti-abortion ads with no religious content would be permitted.
Mike Judge, of the Christian Institute, said the policy was anti-freedom of speech.
“It is insulting to say that a Christian perspective on the subject of abortion would not provide factual information. For Google to suggest that a religious belief means your views on abortion are not factual is outrageous and insulting to millions of religious people,” he said.
“The real test of freedom of speech is whether you allow the viewpoint of people you don’t agree with to be heard.
“By refusing to allow us to advertise, Google are taking away the opportunity to hear a religious point of view.
“That Google allows ads for all of these other products, including pornography and instruments of violence, shows how warped their value system is.”
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23517828-2,00.html




